The ‘bribe’ to silence Wright
#2
Posted 14 May 2012 - 12:13 AM
‘Man, the media ate me alive,” Wright told me when we met in his office at Chicago’s Kwame Nkrumah Academy. “After the media went ballistic on me, I received an e-mail offering me money not to preach at all until the November presidential election.”
“Who sent the e-mail?” I asked Wright.
“It was from one of Barack’s closest friends.”
“He offered you money?”
“Not directly,” Wright said. “He sent the offer to one of the members of the church, who sent it to me.”
“How much money did he offer you?”
“One hundred and fifty thousand dollars,” Wright said.
“Did Obama himself ever make an effort to see you?”
“Yes,” Wright said. “Barack said he wanted to meet me in secret, in a secure place. And I said, ‘You’re used to coming to my home, you’ve been here countless times, so what’s wrong with coming to my home?’ So we met in the living room of the parsonage of Trinity United Church of Christ, at South Pleasant Avenue right off 95th Street, just Barack and me. I don’t know if he had a wire on him. His security was outside somewhere.
“And one of the first things Barack said was, ‘I really wish you wouldn’t do any more public speaking until after the November election.’ He knew I had some speaking engagements lined up, and he said, ‘I wish you wouldn’t speak. It’s gonna hurt the campaign if you do that.’
“And what did you say?” I asked. “I said, ‘I don’t see it that way. And anyway, how am I supposed to support my family?’ And he said, ‘Well, I wish you wouldn’t speak in public. The press is gonna eat you alive.’
“Barack said, ‘I’m sorry you don’t see it the way I do. Do you know what your problem is?’ And I said, ‘No, what’s my problem?’ And he said, ‘You have to tell the truth.’ I said, ‘That’s a good problem to have. That’s a good problem for all preachers to have. That’s why I could never be a politician.’
“And he said, ‘It’s going to get worse if you go out there and speak. It’s really going to get worse.’
“And he was so right.”
#11
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:47 AM
--Wikipedia
http://en.wikipedia....i/New_York_Post
#12
Posted 14 May 2012 - 01:56 AM
Folks have been suckered into the us or them mentality and will gladly settle for less as long as their side wins.
Meanwhile Rome burns
#13
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:08 AM
seriously?Does it really make a difference if this is true or not? Those backing Obama will most likely ignore it much like all his other transgressions. Folks have been suckered into the us or them mentality and will gladly settle for less as long as their side wins. Meanwhile Rome burns
ur first line paints people in a corner. obamas corner
ur second line bashes them for being suckered into it...and assumes they are settling for less. i assume less is obama? who is more?
yea rome is burning all right...its called gonorrhea of the mouth
#15
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:22 AM
seriously? ur first line paints people in a corner. obamas corner ur second line bashes them for being suckered into it...and assumes they are settling for less. i assume less is obama? who is more? yea rome is burning all right...its called gonorrhea of the mouth
Who is being painted into a corner? Say it is true, do you think it will make a difference to those planning on voting for him?
It doesn't matter if it's Obama or Romney or any other Dem/Rep, I'm talking about being suckered into the "I have to vote my party no matter what" mentality.
#20
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:38 AM
maybe if people understood how their words came across from another persons point of view, there would be less of this being "painted into a corner" BS
it is what it is...and i will defend my beliefs from anyone who makes me feel like there is a problem with my intelligence or logic.
#30
Posted 14 May 2012 - 02:46 AM
so rons a racist, rand is a bigot, romney is an idiot, and obama is a political briber...thats called a wash. next
This. And I find this about as snooze worthy as Romney being a bully in HS or Ron Paul being backed by racist separatists
I will say, that although I've never been religious, I enjoyed the openness/inclusiveness of the Unitarian Universalist Church in my youth. And we had a great minister, Mack. And we maybe went to services 15-20 times a year - it wasn't a big deal for us. But when we went, it was enjoyable. He crafted great sermons that were less about worshiping a "God" and more about being tolerant and inclusive no matter what your beliefs. Mother's Day would become Muppet's Day with favorite singalongs. Christmas had the best candlelight service with some amazing choir traditionals, but then maybe a Three Dog Night "Joy to the World" thrown in for fun. This was the 80s so there were a lot of immigrant tech people (India, Japan, China, Saudi Arabia...) that came to the services. They didn't have their own places of worship in a rural town of 20k in puritanical Massachusetts. There wasn't a big cross on the wall behind the pulpit - there were all the religious symbols of the world.
Mack was a hero to the communion and local community. He'd be leading the charge at anti-nuke demonstrations and was often arrested. When I was down and out and in the hospital for 3 months at 17, he came to visit me. I hadn't been to a service in 2 years and I doubt my parents had asked him, but somehow he found out and came.
And later that year he would be indicted on rape of some Tibetan girls that had taken refuge in his home... Do a Google of Mack Mitchell Unitarian and there's some details out there. Oprah even did a segment. And do I believe all the sordid details? I'm not sure. Maybe...
What I do know is that Mack did me right through the years. He was unconventional, but I looked up to him.
I think there's probably plenty of controversial ministers out there. That's not to defend Rev Wright's statements, or many of the other ministers who say controversial things - some of whom I think are total asses. I guess it matters more to me whether you're being controversial by being bigoted, divisive, and exclusionary, or whether you're trying to move the ball forward for everyone.
#42
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:03 AM
This. And I find this about as snooze worthy as Romney being a bully in HS or Ron Paul being backed by racist separatists
I will say, that although I've never been religious, I enjoyed the openness/inclusiveness of the Unitarian Universalist Church in my youth. And we had a great minister, Mack. And we maybe went to services 15-20 times a year - it wasn't a big deal for us. But when we went, it was enjoyable. He crafted great sermons that were less about worshiping a "God" and more about being tolerant and inclusive no matter what your beliefs. Mother's Day would become Muppet's Day with favorite singalongs. Christmas had the best candlelight service with some amazing choir traditionals, but then maybe a Three Dog Night "Joy to the World" thrown in for fun. This was the 80s so there were a lot of immigrant tech people (India, Japan, China, Saudi Arabia...) that came to the services. They didn't have their own places of worship in a rural town of 20k in puritanical Massachusetts. There wasn't a big cross on the wall behind the pulpit - there were all the religious symbols of the world. Mack was a hero to the communion and local community. He'd be leading the charge at anti-nuke demonstrations and was often arrested. When I was down and out and in the hospital for 3 months at 17, he came to visit me. I hadn't been to a service in 2 years and I doubt my parents had asked him, but somehow he found out and came. And later that year he would be indicted on rape of some Tibetan girls that had taken refuge in his home... Do a Google of Mack Mitchell Unitarian and there's some details out there. Oprah even did a segment. And do I believe all the sordid details? I'm not sure. Maybe... What I do know is that Mack did me right through the years. He was unconventional, but I looked up to him. I think there's probably plenty of controversial ministers out there. That's not to defend Rev Wright's statements, or many of the other ministers who say controversial things - some of whom I think are total asses. I guess it matters more to me whether you're being controversial by being bigoted, divisive, and exclusionary, or whether you're trying to move the ball forward for everyone.
there, you happy now?
someone reply to this.
#43
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:06 AM
Hello, you must be new around here, welcome to the boardWell I see I wasted my time writing a thoughtful reply, as this has just turned into the usual "Obama = Good" and Ron Paul and Romney can go suck it conversation with a few dissenters. Thanks PeaceFrog - you add so much to the debate around here
#46
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:13 AM
I was actually a little bit down on Obama until I seen how much a couple people on this board hate him... It's polarizing.
i feel this way too...i shouldnt.... its weak on my part .but i do believe what i believe. and im not imune to getting baited into shit...especially when the rhetoric is so thick i can swim through it
#47
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:19 AM
It's no revelation as to what TASB's, yours, Joker's, and many of the rest of our politics are on this board.
Yet you seem to make it a game to see how many replies you can get to your replies that don't say anything new, just poke the dead horse. And when asked to intelligently debate something, you just defer to a bunch of BS. Sorry, but that's "troll" behavior if I ever saw it. If your serious, you'd engage more intelligibly. But you don't - it's the same old BS again and again....
#48
Posted 14 May 2012 - 03:24 AM
Seriously, are you going to have an intelligent debate with someone who thinks Ron Paul still has a shot at the RNC?
You're right. I ought to just ignore it. I will try to do so from now on.
#49
Posted 14 May 2012 - 11:10 AM
This. And I find this about as snooze worthy as Romney being a bully in HS or Ron Paul being backed by racist separatists
I will say, that although I've never been religious, I enjoyed the openness/inclusiveness of the Unitarian Universalist Church in my youth. And we had a great minister, Mack. And we maybe went to services 15-20 times a year - it wasn't a big deal for us. But when we went, it was enjoyable. He crafted great sermons that were less about worshiping a "God" and more about being tolerant and inclusive no matter what your beliefs. Mother's Day would become Muppet's Day with favorite singalongs. Christmas had the best candlelight service with some amazing choir traditionals, but then maybe a Three Dog Night "Joy to the World" thrown in for fun. This was the 80s so there were a lot of immigrant tech people (India, Japan, China, Saudi Arabia...) that came to the services. They didn't have their own places of worship in a rural town of 20k in puritanical Massachusetts. There wasn't a big cross on the wall behind the pulpit - there were all the religious symbols of the world. Mack was a hero to the communion and local community. He'd be leading the charge at anti-nuke demonstrations and was often arrested. When I was down and out and in the hospital for 3 months at 17, he came to visit me. I hadn't been to a service in 2 years and I doubt my parents had asked him, but somehow he found out and came. And later that year he would be indicted on rape of some Tibetan girls that had taken refuge in his home... Do a Google of Mack Mitchell Unitarian and there's some details out there. Oprah even did a segment. And do I believe all the sordid details? I'm not sure. Maybe... What I do know is that Mack did me right through the years. He was unconventional, but I looked up to him. I think there's probably plenty of controversial ministers out there. That's not to defend Rev Wright's statements, or many of the other ministers who say controversial things - some of whom I think are total asses. I guess it matters more to me whether you're being controversial by being bigoted, divisive, and exclusionary, or whether you're trying to move the ball forward for everyone.
That's all well and good. But, if Wright is telling the truth, and I see no reason for him to lie, being Obama's minister (or pastor or however it works) for 20 years. A political bribe to shut him up for the election year doesn't say much about Obama as upstanding and having the people's interests first. He has his re-election on his mind. Enough to kick his own under the bus. If he'll do that, it's safe to say he doesn't care about the people.












