The 99% Spring
#1
Posted 06 April 2012 - 03:22 PM
Occupy Wall Street Activists Respond to the 99 Percent Spring
Allison Kilkenny on April 6, 2012 - 10:38 AM ET
Seizing on the popularity of Occupy Wall Street, a broad coalition of liberal-left groups and organizations created the 99 Percent Spring, a movement aiming to recruit and train 100,000 Americans to learn the ways of non-violent direct action. The initiative is led by MoveOn.org, and includes support from the AFL-CIO, Greenpeace, the Working Families Party, 350.org, Campaign for America's Future, United Students Against Sweatshops, CodePink, Global Exchange and Color of Change, among other groups.
The plan has been heavily promoted by celebrities such as Edward Norton, Elijah Wood, Marisa Tomei and Jason Alexander and political heavyweights like Van Jones, founder of Rebuild the Dream.
However, Occupy Wall Street protesters have expressed mixed feelings about the 99 Percent Spring, a response that should have been expected given a statement like, "Occupiers have varying opinions," is a beige platitude akin to, "humans have varying opinions on life." OWS is a big tent movement, and as such, it attracts the entire gamut of the (generally) lefty political spectrum.
"I can't blame the Occupy movement for being at best suspicious," says Joe Macare of Truthout and the Occupied Chicago Tribune, and observer of the Occupy movement, pointing out the 99 Percent Spring has adopted the language and imagery of Occupy Wall Street.
"I think Van Jones means well and is a smart, formidable guy, but I disagree with a lot of what I've read in his analysis about the extent to which President Obama, as opposed to just the Tea Party, the GOP-controlled Congress, etc., needs to be held responsible for the mess the United States is in. If Rebuild the Dream and MoveOn.org are serious about challenging corporate power, that's going to mean calling out a lot of Democratic policies and a lot of Democratic politicians who are bought and paid for by the private sector."
#4
Posted 11 April 2012 - 06:34 PM
You had a problem with the tents. You had a problem with the message. You had a problem with the "violence."
And now you're worried that the movement will be corrupted
JOKE
#7
Posted 11 April 2012 - 07:25 PM
http://www.gathering...rk/page__st__50
#10
Posted 11 April 2012 - 07:38 PM
And? It's the law that says they're not allowed to do it, not me."Folks do have the right to assemble, they dont have the right to set up shop, basically squatting, and prevent others from using public property." http://www.gathering...rk/page__st__50
#17
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:14 PM
I think this 99% Spring is more about support for the Dems and Obama than it is the Wall St. issue.People who are concerned with what a movement is called are missing the point. Aren't you doing this to promote your issues? Who gives a damn who gets the credit.
#18
Posted 11 April 2012 - 08:26 PM
People who are concerned with what a movement is called are missing the point. Aren't you doing this to promote your issues? Who gives a damn who gets the credit.
people are concerned about some lolberal douchebags coming along and stealing the fire and taking a movement that supports no political parties and trying to repackage it into an obama election campaign
obama and the dems have no concern for the "99%" and they need to stop acting like they do just bc it's election time
#25
Posted 12 April 2012 - 07:34 PM
Other than the gneub with the boobz, those I have called out, earned the title












