
reportedly over 1,000 attended...i was not able to make it...the initial meeting had about 350 when i was there
and to think, it went on during the Phils playoff game (which is why i missed it:funny1: ) and still tripled in numbers
Posted 05 October 2011 - 07:31 PM
Posted 05 October 2011 - 10:41 PM
reportedly over 1,000 attended...i was not able to make it...the initial meeting had about 350 when i was there
and to think, it went on during the Phils playoff game (which is why i missed it:funny1: ) and still tripled in numbers
Posted 05 October 2011 - 10:56 PM
Posted 05 October 2011 - 11:50 PM
Posted 06 October 2011 - 05:28 PM
Posted 06 October 2011 - 05:37 PM
Getting angry is fine but when it results in breaking laws and putting other people in danger it goes from being a group of angry citizens protesting to being an uncontrolled mob rioting.why are people so critical of citizens getting angry? do they even need a specific agenda or solution or can they just say something isn't working?
Posted 06 October 2011 - 05:54 PM
Posted 06 October 2011 - 06:08 PM
What was the barricade there for? What were the people passing through it doing? What was their intent?what is more dangerous? the people passing through the barricade or the barricade itself?
Well on the bridge they were disrupting and blocking traffic, that, in itself, causes a danger to the lives of anyone that might need an ambulance, fire dept. etc...what actual dangers have the protesters caused? none. nuisances? mayhaps prolly, but nuisances can be dealt with without batons and pepper spray, especially when the protesters have STILL not resorted to violence
Posted 06 October 2011 - 06:16 PM
This is sooooo inspiring.
why are people bashing this? is this really about mcdonald's bathrooms? or whether people should have been on a bridge? or misdirected hippies? or shadowy background Soro's figures? it is if you choose to make it about that. why are people so critical of citizens getting angry? do they even need a specific agenda or solution or can they just say something isn't working? we ALL know something isn't working. the govt is not working for us and individuals are now saying we want to stand with other citizens and let them know we're starting to pay attention. i think it's incredible.
Posted 06 October 2011 - 06:33 PM
What was the barricade there for? What were the people passing through it doing? What was their intent?
Well on the bridge they were disrupting and blocking traffic, that, in itself, causes a danger to the lives of anyone that might need an ambulance, fire dept. etc...
So to say they have caused no danger is completely wrong
Posted 06 October 2011 - 06:59 PM
I've seen nothing showing them being lured out into the middle of traffic. What I have seen is video showing them being warned not to do so.the jury is still out as to whether or not they were lured onto the bridge...even still, the traffic was gone and blocked off AFTER they were on the bridge, and the police surrounding them on both sides and squeezing them into as small a space as possible and in turn turning the bridge into a giant holding pen is far more dangerous
it's either a trap or piss poor management, either way 700 arrests is in no way justified
do these cops' supervisor have no experience in something as simple as directing traffic?
Posted 06 October 2011 - 07:01 PM
Posted 06 October 2011 - 07:27 PM
ok, forget the bridge
as a life long new yorker i ask, got any proof for this ?
the problem is that the nypd has been corrupted and is doing the bidding of their masters instead of serving their duties to the people...the evidence of this is all over this forum, with the donations and the hired private security wearing cop uniforms
any ideas on why they had to storm Wall St last night, 3 hours after the exchange closed, other than looking for confrontation ?
Posted 06 October 2011 - 08:07 PM
Posted 06 October 2011 - 08:16 PM
Posted 06 October 2011 - 08:18 PM
I've seen nothing showing them being lured out into the middle of traffic. What I have seen is video showing them being warned not to do so.
If you want to go on thinking the protesters are doing nothing wrong then you just go on thinking it.
Posted 06 October 2011 - 09:02 PM
Did you see the video of the cop telling them not to go that way or they'd be arrested? I've been told there are also signs, not to mention laws, about not walking in the street or blocking traffic.i have to say that while i can say that i do see both sides of this argument, that this bridge issue appears to be somewhat entrapment-esque.
i also would like to say that there have been many instances where i have personally witnessed police acting in a rude and arrogant manner that is downright unprofessional, and could easily be viewed as instigating a bigger problem. to get slightly off topic for a second, i witnessed some people having a run-in with the police outside of a music venue last night. the people were clearly doing something illegal, so i cannot dispute the nature of the arrest. what i did have a problem with was the attitude of the arresting officers.
the arrest was happening around the corner from the venue in plain sight on the sidewalk. there were a couple of police officers talking to someone and going through their pockets. as a friend of mine approached the scene, he attempted to walk around the arrest on the sidewalk, when the officer barked at him in an arrogant tone to the effect of "what the hell are you doing, you can't walk here", when he could have said "excuse me sir you are going to have to go around us".
while the aresst was happening the officers addressed the group of people in question in a derogatory tone, smirking and chuckling at them. it was if it was a big joke to them. now, had the arrestee gotten upset over the way the cops were acting and acted out, he would have been the one charged with an additional crime, even though his behavior was preceeded by immature professionalism.
the impression i left with was that the police while correct for arresting someone, did so in a completely immature manner. i could write a lengthy segment if i wanted to highlight numerous other first hand observations of police acting in such a mannor.
just because someone is doing something illegal, does not give the police the right to act in an unprofessional or immature mannor. the responsibility of respect goes both ways.
maybe someone can help me to understand entrapment a little bit better..?