Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Reminder to refrain from vulgar endorsements


  • Please log in to reply
14 replies to this topic

#1 elder

elder
  • VibeTribe
  • 4,519 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:06 PM

Endorsing either of these 2 is just simply disgusting. Please refrain as you never know what voting age children are lurking.


Posted Image

#2 Joker

Joker
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,632 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:10 PM

I endorse the non-endorsing of either of these doodyheads

#3 Phishfolk

Phishfolk
  • VibeTribe
  • 8,851 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:13 PM

Penis

#4 capt_morgan

capt_morgan
  • VibeTribe
  • 15,549 posts
  • Locationatlantic ocean

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:14 PM

bam bam in the hooha

#5 Deadshow Dan

Deadshow Dan
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,905 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:16 PM

Endorsing any of these is just simply disgusting. Please refrain as you never know what voting age children are lurking.


Posted Image

corrected :coffee:

#6 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:26 PM

:rotf:

Here comes the obama royal guard.

#7 robberry

robberry
  • VibeTribe
  • 5,219 posts
  • LocationNew York

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:26 PM

Posted Image

#8 elder

elder
  • VibeTribe
  • 4,519 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:29 PM

Yes Dan, they're all pretty disgusting too (except for RP :wink:)

But it doesn't make your vulgar endorsement any prettier

Posted Image

#9 Uncle Coulro

Uncle Coulro
  • VibeTribe
  • 2,563 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 08:30 PM

Posted Image

#10 Deadshow Dan

Deadshow Dan
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,905 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 09:11 PM

You can repeat your fail all you want.

Don't make it true. President Obama had a fairly successful first two years.

elder, I like how you say except for RP. Cause there's not a lot of difference between RP and RP.

Posted Image

#11 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 11:20 PM

Posted Image

#12 elder

elder
  • VibeTribe
  • 4,519 posts

Posted 26 September 2011 - 11:21 PM

Again, how interesting that as soon as a thread, even one meant as a spinoff, says anything anti-obama, it gets moved.

Either someone keeps crying to the VG's like a little baby, or its just a thinly veiled attempt at censorship.

Either way it blows (no children that may be lurking, not in the way the wind blows. Use your little imaginations :wink:)

#13 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 27 September 2011 - 12:54 AM

Posted Image

Posted Image

#14 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 11:05 AM

Hey Elder:

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner didn’t dispute a Harvard economist’s estimate that each job in the White House’s jobs plan would cost $200,000, but said the pricetag is the wrong way to measure the bill’s worth.
And he also pointed out, in an interview today with ABC News’ David Muir, that there is no other option on the table for getting the economy moving and putting more people back to work.
“ You've got to think about the costs of the alternatives,” Geithner said when asked about Harvard economist Martin Feldstein’s calculation that each job created by President Obama’s American Jobs Act would cost taxpayers about $200,000.

http://abcnews.go.co...ory?id=14609951

FAIL is right....right across his face.

#15 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 28 September 2011 - 11:08 AM

Just like Dan's statistical chart, it is a false representation of the facts. Those numbers also leave out the 100,000s that gave up looking for work. Thats how government statistics get ya.