yes you do...in the 2 worst videos there is a good 15 seconds of pre-attack footage
show me
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:05 PM
this is real easy...if there was ANY footage...and i mean ANY footage of the protesters breaking laws, antagonizing law enforcement, etc., it'd be plastered EVERYWHERE as justification for the police to shut it down. period.
the surprising dearth of such footage tells me it doesn't exist yet.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:11 PM
Maybe you're only seeing what you want to see. There's more than a few grabbing at them when they pull the girl dressed in black wearing the backpack through the barricade, and it certainly seems like some of the protesters are trying to breach that barricade. Do I hear screams of tear it down?well i've been watching everything...all of it...noone tried to grab any cops...their attacks are clearly unprovoked and in most cases the videos show quite a few seconds before the police attacks
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:17 PM
yeah, I know there are cops with cameras
who is to say when they'll release their footage, if ever
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:22 PM
i'd imagine the second people started yelling "police brutality!" would've been the right time for them to say "no, actually, here's what you didn't see" and present that to the casual observer so's we can makes our own judgements.
sure looks like a lack of quality material, if you ask me...
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:27 PM
is, in fact, also speculation.just because we haven't seen any other footage yet, doesn't mean it doesn't exist
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:32 PM
Perhaps the police are just gathering their footage and will make it public at a later time or they'll use it to refute any actual charges that are brought against them.
Not showing your cards until the hand is over isn't really a bad idea
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:35 PM
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:36 PM
The very statement:
is, in fact, also speculation.
This is a message board. where people share their opinions on subjects.
protip: opinion is a synonym of speculation...
http://thesaurus.com/browse/opinion
oh, right. i'm supposed to:wink:
:wink:
:wink:
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:37 PM
Maybe you're only seeing what you want to see. There's more than a few grabbing at them when they pull the girl dressed in black wearing the backpack through the barricade, and it certainly seems like some of the protesters are trying to breach that barricade. Do I hear screams of tear it down?
I can't tell for sure, but it looks like the girl in the gray tank top (holding what looks like a cover to a pan?) that's in the middle of that scene grabbing the arm of the cop in white, is the same one that's screaming after getting sprayed.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:37 PM
yes, I understand that part of it:wink:
Originally Posted by vic
well i've been watching everything...all of it...noone tried to grab any cops...their attacks are clearly unprovoked and in most cases the videos show quite a few seconds before the police attacks
I don't believe for 1 minute that vic could have all the facts based on the video footage that we've seen so far
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:39 PM
perhaps.
of course, making it public immediately would reduce the probability of said charges ever being made in the first place, and perhaps help them show cause to legally disperse the protesters, if that's what they're looking to do. there's really no reason not to show it if you've got it right now, because the negative PR is something the NYPD really doesn't want or need.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:41 PM
yes, I understand that part of it:wink:
Originally Posted by vic
well i've been watching everything...all of it...noone tried to grab any cops...their attacks are clearly unprovoked and in most cases the videos show quite a few seconds before the police attacks
I don't believe for 1 minute that vic could have all the facts based on the video footage that we've seen so far
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:44 PM
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:44 PM
you can look through this very thread
but here's one that wasn't posted...white shirt...again
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:47 PM
Quit bickering already. Neither of you are down there to get first hand account. I saw people clearly breaking the laws from my stroll through (not that it is hard to break laws in NYC).
Go down there and protest and then report back on observed and perhaps recorded brutality.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:49 PM
Again we don't see what he did while the other protester was being arrested. He was told to get back (looks like one of his comrades even tried to get him to pull back) but he decided not to do so and instead got in the cops face. I'm pretty sure that's reason enough to arrest him.you can look through this very thread
but here's one that wasn't posted...white shirt...again
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:52 PM
Again we don't see what he did while the other protester was being arrested. He was told to get back (looks like one of his comrades even tried to get him to pull back) but he decided not to do so and instead got in the cops face. I'm pretty sure that's reason enough to arrest him.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:52 PM
Any cop that is guilty of any wrongdoing should be held accountable.you're seeing what you want to see...we agree on a ton of shit but it seems consistent that you go soft when it comes to cops
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:56 PM
I'm willing to bet he wasn't arrested for "talking to an officer"so someone can get arrested for talking to an officer? suite. the cop pushes him. clearly. the guy never laid a hand not looked like he was going to lay a hand on the cop.
i'd love to stop bickering but i'm so goddamn sick of cop sympathizers that think they should be allowed to do whatever the hell they want.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 03:59 PM
so someone can get arrested for talking to an officer? suite. the cop pushes him. clearly. the guy never laid a hand not looked like he was going to lay a hand on the cop.
i'd love to stop bickering but i'm so goddamn sick of cop sympathizers that think they should be allowed to do whatever the hell they want.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:06 PM
probably the cops with cameras of their own that can be seen in many of the videos
Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:15 PM
Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:21 PM
That's another thing, the cops could be acting on info they've received from other cameras and/or officers so what looks like cops going in and just randomly grabbing people could be them going in after someone that has already done something wrong and who may be trying to hide out in with the crowd.
Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:21 PM
Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:35 PM
Because all those cameras couldn't possibly pick up anybody doing anything wrong? Because someone couldn't actually see somebody doing something wrong that wasn't caught on video? Because those there to start trouble hoping for conflict couldn't possibly be hiding out amongst the crowd?bc it is absurd
Posted 27 September 2011 - 04:40 PM
Dude I didn't say that. And I didn't say the cops haven't done anything wrong. I'm saying we don't know everything.so the pepper spray was a cop who fond someone from earlier that he had to spray and run away from?