Jump to content



Photo
* * * * * 1 votes

Occupy Wall St.


  • Please log in to reply
2438 replies to this topic

#1951 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 24 February 2012 - 01:40 PM

An update on this poor guy's house

Posted Image

How 'Occupy' went wrong

A trashed house in Brooklyn has become a symbol of a movement that failed to capitalize on popular anger


On Dec. 6, nearly 300 members of the Occupy Wall Street movement flooded into East New York to begin what they considered phase two of their efforts. A few weeks earlier, they had been rousted from Manhattan’s Zuccotti Park, where they had camped for three months — attracting worldwide attention and forcing politicians to take notice.


But for all the hype, Occupy was being criticized — even from the left — for being vague in its goals. The signs railed against bailouts and the greed of the 1%, but protesters coalesced around no legislation, no candidate, no reforms. Everyone agreed that inequality is bad, but what to do about it?

“Occupy Our Homes” was that idea. The group would take over an empty house, foreclosed on by a bank, fix it up and provide shelter to a homeless family.

For those sympathetic to the Occupy movement, it was a brilliant strategy. Foreclosures touched almost every neighborhood in America; an estimated 1.2 million homes were repossessed in 2011. In East New York, the hardest hit in the city, the foreclosure crisis struck 16.8 homes per thousand. Occupy Our Homes would alleviate neighborhood blight, provide shelter to the poor — and put banks on the defensive.

The atmosphere was giddy that overcast December day. A swell of people hung banners (“Foreclose on Banks, Not People”) and chanted on Vermont Street, waiting to welcome new neighbors to 702, the two-story rowhouse Occupy had taken over.

The excitement reached a crescendo when Councilman Charles Barron (D-Brooklyn) knocked on the door, decorated with a pine wreath for Christmas, and out came the homeless man who was moving in with his family, Alfredo Carrasquillo.

Barron raised Carrasquillo’s arm in victory.

Last week,Wise Ahadzi opened the door to the house he still owns, 702 Vermont Street in East New York.

Inside is a war zone. The walls are torn down, the plumbing is ripped out and the carpeting has been plucked from the floor. It’s like walking through a ribcage.

Garbage, open food containers and Ahadzi’s possessions are tossed haphazardly around the house.

“This is where my kitchen was,” Ahadzi says. There is no sink, no refrigerator and no counter space. Instead there are dirty dishes piled high waiting for a dip in three large buckets of putrid water that serve as the dishwashing system.

In a first-floor bathroom, Christmas lights dangle from a shower curtain rod. The only thing separating a toilet from the elements outside is a thin veil of paper.


Much more including photos
http://www.nypost.co...I#ixzz1nJ2nOdeW

#1952 DancingBearly

  • VibeTribe
  • 7,915 posts
  • LocationQuiet Corner

Posted 25 February 2012 - 09:58 AM

[quote name='Joker']An update on this poor guy's house

Posted Image

[B]How 'Occupy' went wrong

A trashed house in Brooklyn has become a symbol of a movement that failed to capitalize on popular anger


On Dec. 6, nearly 300 members of the Occupy Wall Street movement flooded into East New York to begin what they considered phase two of their efforts. A few weeks earlier, they had been rousted from Manhattan

#1953 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 27 February 2012 - 06:52 PM

Well it's not like they don't have the money to make this right. Hopefully they'll pay to have his house properly repaired

Occupy Wall Street Bank Statement Shows $99,000 Balance, Expenses for Housing, Property Damage, Bail


Occupy Wall Street bank statement shows $99,000 balance, expenses for housing, property damage, bail

By David Martosko - The Daily Caller, Executive Editor

The Daily Caller has obtained a copy of a December 2011 bank statement mailed to Occupy Wall Street, the anti-capitalist protest group whose leaders’ rallying cry positions them as defenders of America’s less-privileged “99 percent.” But the organization’s bank balance in December may instead re-cast the occupiers as defenders of the $99,000.

The bank statement was mailed to the organization at a box rented in a UPS Store on Fulton Street in lower Manhattan. On the Dec. 30 closing date, Amalgamated Bank reported $99,549.58 in the account, including $23,120 in deposits during that month alone.

Amalgamated is owned by the Workers United labor union.

TheDC has also obtained copies of two December statement pages from a second bank account owned by an Occupy Wall Street-affiliated organization called Friends of Liberty Park. Those pages show records of nine checks and ten cash withdrawals, all signed by Pete Dutro, the group’s leader and Occupy Wall Street’s financial manager at the time.

While the materials clearly reflect two separate bank accounts, only the last two digits of their nine-digit account numbers are different. TheDC has redacted its copies of the documents to remove those account numbers.

Sources who provided TheDC with copies of the bank statements also provided a copy of meeting minutes from a Feb. 17 gathering of an Occupy Wall Street subgroup called “OWS Reform.” Notes taken during the meeting include an observation that the Friends of Liberty Park account “went from $310,168.74 at 12/01 to $147,040.15 at 12/30,” reflecting a loss of more than half the account’s value during the month of December.

“Why not call an independent auditor and have them go over the books?” the minutes ask. Criticizing the movement’s self-anointed finance officers, they complain that a lack of access to the movement’s bank accounts “gives them hierarchy in a supposedly leaderless movement.”


http://nation.foxnew...property-damage

#1954 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 28 February 2012 - 01:25 PM

Officers hurt in Occupy clash in Calif. Capitol

At least two law enforcement officers were injured during a clash with members of the Occupy movement who were at the state Capitol to protest a rally by a pro-white group.

The clash erupted about 3 p.m. Monday as California Highway Patrol and Sacramento city police officers were escorting about 35 members of the South Africa Project to a parking garage following their protest outside the Capitol building.

An Associated Press photographer says roughly 50 members of Occupy Oakland began throwing cans and bottles at the South Africa group and at the officers. The Occupy members then rushed the officers as people with the pro-whites group rushed into the parking garage.

A city police officer was injured when a member of the Occupy group jumped on him, and a CHP officer was hurt after being struck by an object. Both were taken from the scene by ambulance.

At least two Occupy members were arrested.

The violence abated after a large contingent of law enforcement arrived at the scene, about one block from the Capitol.

More
http://articles.bost...icer-protesters

#1955 Rionach aka Spec K

  • VibeTribe
  • 5,210 posts

Posted 29 February 2012 - 04:17 PM

Aren't they supposed to be shutting down corporations today? :funny1:
doesn't seem to be working - the one I work for is still business as usual

#1956 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 04:45 PM

Videos: NYPD Randomly Arrests Occupy Wall Street Protesters At Zuccotti Park

(Katie Sokoler/Gothamist )

http://gothamist.com...est.php#photo-1

Eight Occupy Wall Street protesters were arrested in Lower Manhattan late last night as the NYPD shut down Zuccotti Park in a strong and often baffling show of force. At the height of the confrontation, there were approximately 40 NYPD officers monitoring around 30 protesters, and the arrests, many of which were seemingly arbitrary and incidental, were spurred after several protesters brought backpacks and sleeping bags into the park.

Charley, a protester who refused to give his last name, said that the group arrived at Zuccotti Park after a march from Union Square earlier in the day. "A few people have sleeping bags, and we have a huge rug too. We're basically seeing what [the police] will tolerate. I don't know that we're all planning on sleeping here."

Protesters claimed the park's private security force told them they could bring in blankets. "We can't look the other way but by all means," one of the guards said. A female NYPD officer strolling through the park grabbed a protester's blanket. "This is a sleeping bag," the officer determined, before reconsidering. "Or, no, it's a blanket. It's, it's a sleeping bag." The protester rolled up the blanket and walked out of the park. Officer DiPace told us, "The chief wants us to lock everybody up."

Shortly before midnight, a group of officers began moving through the park, inspecting bags, and shooing away the handful of protesters, some of whom scattered immediately rather than have their bags inspected. When asked what law they were breaking, Officer DiPace replied, "There's a law against everything. That's America." At the entrance to the park, the arrests began with the individual seen in this video, who insists police arrested him after sat down on the sidewalk.


Around the 1:23 and 1:30 marks of the video above, Officer Rosado (who declined to give his first name) can be seen ordering the arrests of two individuals standing in a small crowd outside of the park, shortly after the NYPD declared it closed. Those who objected to the arrests were arrested. The NYPD press office later told us there were eight arrests; seven were charged with disorderly conduct and one for obstructing governmental administration.

As the small group of protesters stood at the southeast end of the park, a handful began singing "American Pie." Officer McNamara quickly asked the group for its attention. "This is New York City, you can't be making noise at night," he said. "I don't want to have to put you away, but you have to be quiet. If not, you'll be next in the wagon. If you cross the line, you'll go to jail." Several protesters asked Officer McNamara why the park wasn't open as it was legally required to be, and he walked away.

Asked why the park was closed, one of the officers standing guard in the east end of the park replied, "Why are you asking stupid questions?" At this point, Officer Rosado began to point out people with backpacks to arrest who weren't standing inside the park, as if he was picking the remaining apples from a denuded tree. By 12:45 a.m., about 20 protesters remained.


"They arrest us for being here in communion with one another. For sitting and talking and having meaningful discourse," a young man named Chris O'Donnell observed. Soon after, another protester defiantly walked through the park, and police moved into make an arrest. As the unidentified demonstrator ran down Cedar Street, the police gave chase, and Officer Rosado derisively shouted, "Why are you running? I thought you believed in something!"

By 1 a.m., only police remained, guarding an empty park:




videos in link...don't know how to post vimeo shit here and don't feel like going through the effort

clearly the city is trying to squash whatever remains of OWS with no regard for any laws or legalities

spring is closing in.

#1957 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:13 PM

We're basically seeing what [the police] will tolerate.


We know what we're doing can get us arrested but we're going to do it anyway and then bitch about it.



:lol:

#1958 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:42 PM

The ship of having discussion/debate with you, jack, has sailed...go fuck yourself:smile:

#1959 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 01 March 2012 - 05:58 PM

The ship of having discussion/debate with you, jack, has sailed...go fuck yourself:smile:


I read his comment, and didn't even have a response. He's living in a world of his own making where everyone whines and complains except him.

#1960 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 06:19 PM

yeah, let's talk about the quotes in here that actually matter, not one about someone seeing what is tolerated without breaking any laws

Officer DiPace told us, "The chief wants us to lock everybody up."

When asked what law they were breaking, Officer DiPace replied, "There's a law against everything. That's America."

Several protesters asked Officer McNamara why the park wasn't open as it was legally required to be, and he walked away.

Asked why the park was closed, one of the officers standing guard in the east end of the park replied, "Why are you asking stupid questions?"


if my memory serves me well, there was an order given that people cannot be kept out of the park and that police were violating safety regulations by barricading zuccotti. jack has absolutely no legs to stand on in this argument, and will not be given time of day by me any longer anyway.

#1961 Java Time

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,044 posts
  • Locationthe Island

Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:12 PM

I was actually looking forward to Occupy back in the media center of the world again...with the hopes of starting a new positive outlook and starting from the beginning where the Occupy movement was a positive thing!

maybe that's why they don't want them setting up shop again.

#1962 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:43 PM

maybe that's why they don't want them setting up shop again.


they will anyway...though maybe not camping, i can see zuccotti being a meeting place of sorts for direct actions and the sort...and it could get real big...look what has transpired in the political spectrum since (ndaa, sopa, trespass bill etc.) things could get reeeallly interesting

never have the words "whose side are you on" matter more than they will when this gets fired up again

#1963 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 07:51 PM

The ship of having discussion/debate with you, jack, has sailed...go fuck yourself:smile:

And right back at it :rolleyes:


http://gatheringofth...ead.php?t=68082

http://gatheringofth...ead.php?t=66890


what a moran :rotf:

#1964 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:25 PM

somebody say something?:dunno:

#1965 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:30 PM

vic 377
TakeAStepBack 246
Joker 217
Rionach aka Spec K 110
capt_morgan 98
PeaceFrog 94
china cat 89
Raynequeen 55
DancingBearly 42
jg 42
Feck 37
Kawak 34
Sunshower 30
TEO 28
Lazy Lightning 28
Spidergawd 27
Julius 26
Dee2.0 25
Dr. Lostreality 24
Jwheelz 21
robberry 20
In A Silent Way 20
GoPlastic 19
Java Time 17
TheDHJ 17
seany 12
concert andy 11
MeOmYo 11
JBetty 11
Slave Self Promoted 11
Mind Left Body 11
u.s.blues 11
wonka 9
listen2sloka 9
deadheadskier 8
SunshineDrummer 8
HasATinyHat 7
bitrush 7
Bone Daddy 6
Uncle Coulro 6
freerange 6
James420 6
Tim The Beek 6
unbroken_chain 5
KrisNYG 5
Lemireacle 4
gregoir 4
scarfire 4
alsoa 4
ladygingechilla 4
sarah b. 3
phishNtrips 2
B. Diddy 2
ButthurtHippie 2
Danimal 2
Nuthatch 2
Speckta 2
justcallmejoe 2
drvic 2
little frog 1
Mama Kel 1
BHB 1
bizzle 1
Ezekiel Tweakscrotum 1
Jack Straw 1
OnBongos 1
Sugar_Mag 1
Gwendolyn 1
nikkiblue 1
Kuzsin 1
Esau 1
Phishfolk 1
staggerlee024 1
Karen 1
beerzrkr 1

I'm in the top 10, so I think I've said enough :)

#1966 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 09:39 PM

i are win:gop:

#1967 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 01 March 2012 - 11:05 PM

Car plows through Occupy demonstrators at UC Santa Cruz campus

SANTA CRUZ -- About a hundred students blocked entrance to the UC Santa Cruz campus Thursday morning, not allowing vehicles to enter as part of an Occupy Education rally.

Just after 8:30 a.m. a man driving a Ford Mustang drove up High Street and tried to make a right turn onto campus. He revved his engine, but the crowd briefly stopped him from entering. The driver then revved his engine again and drove through the crowd of demonstrators at the High Street entrance, striking several people and a bike.

No one was seriously injured. UCSC Police Chief Nader Oweis, who was the only officer on scene when the incident happened, ordered the driver to back up the car, out of the crowded intersection.

The crowd chanted "arrest him, arrest him." The driver and his female passenger were detained and removed from the area, which was quickly swarming with police.

Abby Edwards, 20, said she was knocked to the ground by the car, hitting her head and her knee because of the impact.

"Suddenly I'm on the hood and then on the ground," she said.

Edwards said she was very close to being under the car before someone pulled her to safety.

"It's important for all of us to be with each other," said Edwards, who has been on campus since 4:30 a.m. "We closed the campus." Judith Samson, the passenger in the Mustang, emailed the Sentinel about the incident. She wrote "We did not speed through the crowd. In fact, we were going less than 1 mph when the mob swarmed over our car, attempted to open the doors and windows, kicked our lights in and threw paint all over the car."

Samson said they intend to press charges against those in the crowd.

More
http://www.mercuryne...9890?source=rss

#1968 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 03:12 PM

HR 347 threatens freedom of assembly - restricts political protest

U.S. House passes bill giving the federal government new and sweeping powers to bring charges against Americans engaged in political protest anywhere in the country. Critics claim the bill, HR 347, would make free speech a felony, and restrict political protest.


HR 347, the

#1969 Bone Daddy

  • VibeTribe
  • 1,133 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 05:21 PM

Amendment I

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.

Wouldn't that be unconstitutional?

#1970 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 06:08 PM

the constitution:rotf:

#1971 Java Time

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,044 posts
  • Locationthe Island

Posted 02 March 2012 - 06:57 PM

can't Occupy, or anyone sue the House for enacting an unconstitutional bill?



ooooh....that's 18 posts now:ura1:

#1972 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 07:16 PM

It seems like it would be unconstitutional.

There's plenty of room for abuse

It would only be a matter of time before they'd start expanding the amount of people with secret service protection, pretty soon all of DC would be a no protest.

Hell, give SS protection to state/city officials and there'll really be no fighting city hall

#1973 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 07:57 PM

of course the police will enforce these laws like the puppets they are, and the departments will get rewarded with shiny new toys

#1974 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 08:30 PM

If it becomes law I'd imagine they'd do what they've sworn to do and uphold the law.

No doubt there'll be some folks complaining about it, I'd suggest those folks do all they can now to make sure it doesn't become law rather than just whining about the mean policeman enforcing the law after the fact.

#1975 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 02 March 2012 - 08:37 PM

don't whine. Joker hates competition.

#1976 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 09:37 PM

funny the police aren't upholding any of the laws the bankers broke. just following orders.

#1977 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:30 PM

What bankers broke what laws?

#1978 Java Time

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,044 posts
  • Locationthe Island

Posted 02 March 2012 - 10:37 PM

the law of modus tollens? :dunno:

#1979 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 02 March 2012 - 11:24 PM

meanwhile, in Albany, NY...

Judge drops charges against 88 Occupiers

By Jordan Carleo-Evangelist
Published 04:00 p.m., Friday, March 2, 2012

ALBANY — Seven dozen protesters arrested over the course of Occupy Albany's two-month downtown encampment are officially off the hook.

City Court Judge Thomas K. Keefe has formally dismissed more than 100 charges that were still technically pending against the protesters — long after District Attorney David Soares' office announced that it would not prosecute protesters arrested for nonviolent offenses that did not involve property damage while exercising their free speech rights.

Citing Soares' refusal to prosecute, Keefe wrote in a brief decision that he had no other choice — making official what had been all but a foregone conclusion.

"Absent a clear abuse of discretion, which is not indicated here, this court's only recourse is to dismiss," the judge wrote.

The vast majority of the arrests were made by State Police in Lafayette Park in November, when protesters provoked troopers into arresting them after city police had for weeks refused to do so in neighboring Academy Park, home to the protest's large encampment.

The arrests became a nightly ritual, during which the protesters — a dozen or a more a night — would gather on the state-owned land in violation of its curfew and peacefully await troopers to bind their hands with plastic ties and lead them away.

Soares' refusal to prosecute the arrests — largely for violations such as trespassing — made him an early hero of the movement and a villain to those who viewed the city's refusal to oust the occupiers and Soares' refusal to try them as weak-kneed.

To date, only one protester — 63-year-old William Preston — has pleaded guilty to anything in connection with the encampment.

Preston was charged with resisting arrest, criminal contempt and obstruction of governmental administration during the Dec. 22 confrontation with police that followed the city's dismantling of the encampment.

Preston pleaded guilty last month to disorderly conduct, a noncriminal violation that landed him a $250 fine and a court surcharge around $200.

The protesters remain locked in civil litigation with the city over its enforcement of a court order to dismantle their tents. The occupiers, who are now ensconced in a Madison Avenue storefront, maintain their right to camp in the city-owned park across the street from City Hall and the Capitol — not just protest there — is protected by the First Amendment.

Read more: http://www.timesunio...p#ixzz1o0MOLq6u

#1980 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 03 March 2012 - 06:10 PM

Three 'Occupy Oakland' protesters charged with robbery, hate crimes

Three Occupy Oakland protesters were arrested after they allegedly battered a California woman, stole her wallet and made anti-gay remarks, the Oakland Tribune reported Saturday.

Michael Davis, 32, Nneka Crawford, 23, and Randolph Wilkins, 24, were charged with robbery and hate crime Friday and remained in Dublin, Calif., jail Saturday.

Crawford and Wilkins' bail was set at $105,000 each, while Davis is being held on $100,000 bail, the report said.

Police claim the woman was walking on an Oakland, Calif., street at around 6:00 pm local time Feb. 22 when the alleged incident took place.

The unnamed 42-year-old woman stumbled across a group of Occupy Oakland protesters demonstrating outside a Wells Fargo bank branch and decided to voice her opinion about the protest movement and asked them not to riot in her neighborhood, according to an Oakland Police Department statement.

"She was surrounded by three protesters and battered as they yelled vulgar epithets regarding their perception of her sexual orientation," the statement said, adding her wallet was stolen during the fracas.

"In the department we have zero tolerance for hate crimes," lead investigator Sergeant Randy Wingate said.

Davis was arrested Wednesday and arraigned Friday, while Crawford and Wilkins were arrested Thursday at a different "Occupy" rally. Both are scheduled to be in court Monday for an arrangement hearing, according to the report.

The police department is still searching for other possible suspects, Wingate added.


Read more: http://www.foxnews.c.../#ixzz1o4vtwkoo


Read more: http://www.foxnews.c.../#ixzz1o4vqdcjP

#1981 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 03 March 2012 - 09:02 PM

do you jizz in your pants every time you post one of these?

#1982 Shake Yer Bones

  • VibeTribe
  • 2,319 posts

Posted 04 March 2012 - 11:46 PM

The Occupiers in Rochester, N.Y., have been in Washington Square Park in the city since this whole thing started, but they were notified they must leave the park by March 11.

Rochester mayor Thomas Richards: "They've become the 1 percent keeping the 99 percent out of the park."

#1983 china cat

  • VibeTribe
  • 13,194 posts

Posted 05 March 2012 - 04:32 AM

The Occupiers in Rochester, N.Y., have been in Washington Square Park in the city since this whole thing started, but they were notified they must leave the park by March 11.

Rochester mayor Thomas Richards: "They've become the 1 percent keeping the 99 percent out of the park."


so now they're crackin down on the 1%. cool.

#1984 Shake Yer Bones

  • VibeTribe
  • 2,319 posts

Posted 05 March 2012 - 03:05 PM

It's not so much cracking down as we'd like our park and parking spaces around it back. There's like 12 people left from the original crowd and they've worn out their welcome. The majority of the people in the area have been cool toward them for months, but it's time to clean the park and get it back to the other people who pay taxes to enjoy it. I think local officials have been more than cooperative with the local Occupiers.

#1985 DancingBearly

  • VibeTribe
  • 7,915 posts
  • LocationQuiet Corner

Posted 06 March 2012 - 02:17 AM

It's not so much cracking down as we'd like our park and parking spaces around it back. There's like 12 people left from the original crowd and they've worn out their welcome. The majority of the people in the area have been cool toward them for months, but it's time to clean the park and get it back to the other people who pay taxes to enjoy it. I think local officials have been more than cooperative with the local Occupiers.


Are they stopping you from using the park? I know when the local boy scouts set up their bottle drive in Riverside park in Putnam they dont need a permit and I can not use the space they are occupying but it does not stop me from sharing the park with them. :coffee:

#1986 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 02:44 PM

this is easily the best cracked.com article i've ever read

http://www.cracked.c...to-stop-saying/

#1987 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,261 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:12 PM

Still waiting

What bankers broke what laws?



#1988 TakeAStepBack

  • VibeTribe
  • 16,769 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 03:42 PM

this is easily the best cracked.com article i've ever read

http://www.cracked.c...to-stop-saying/


:lol:

that was funny. just not funny in that "what they are saying makes a lot of sense" way. More in that, envy has gripped this nation with a federal gubmint liplock kinda way. :lol:

Good read.

#1989 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:08 PM

:funny:

I guarantee he didn't make it to page 2.

#1990 MeOmYo

  • VibeTribe
  • 6,008 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:33 PM

Oh shit, PF is awake...

#1991 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:38 PM

Oh shit, PF is awake...


Shouldn't you be in school?

#1992 JBetty

  • VibeTribe
  • 12,884 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:42 PM

Oh shit, PF is awake...




:lol:



Start a thread.

#1993 PeaceFrog

  • VibeTribe
  • 8,284 posts
  • LocationWhisky a Go Go

Posted 06 March 2012 - 04:44 PM

I think his parents should sign a permission slip for him if he wants to post here.

#1994 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:22 PM

Still waiting


Why Isn't Wall Street in Jail?
Financial crooks brought down the world's economy

#1995 TakeAStepBack

  • VibeTribe
  • 16,769 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:28 PM

Rolling Stone on financial fraud?

Anyway, i agree. but if the institutions were to be held accountable and all the facts laid on the table, it might lead to places no federal government agency or justice would want to go in implicating the guilty parties. Because it goes all the way to the top of the fiat financial pyramid.

It's never gonna happen. Ever.

Corporatism'd.

#1996 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:37 PM

he asked a question. i answered it. or at least directed him to an answer.

funny the police aren't upholding any of the laws the bankers broke. just following orders.


the police are the divide that helps the real criminals conquer.

#1997 TakeAStepBack

  • VibeTribe
  • 16,769 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:39 PM

Financial fraud of this magnitude goes way beyond street beat police.

That's like sending the sheriff and his deputy of a tiny rural town, to catch a multi-billion dollar drug traffic ring.

Walker Texas Ranger'd.

#1998 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:49 PM

Financial fraud of this magnitude goes way beyond street beat police.

That's like sending the sheriff and his deputy of a tiny rural town, to catch a multi-billion dollar drug traffic ring.

Walker Texas Ranger'd.


oh i know they can't just walk into goldman sachs office building and make arrests (the fed can, maybe, but that would just be too good)

they sure as hell don't have to beat the shit out of people to protect them though, which is precisely what they're doing

#1999 TakeAStepBack

  • VibeTribe
  • 16,769 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 06:53 PM

They're following orders to keep their jobs. But I digress.

This is basically the result of months of OWS conversations. A devolve into cops vs. protesters. the conversation has long since been over on the reason and replaced with sympotms of the actions.

Good night suite prince. (((OWS)))

#2000 vic

  • VibeTribe
  • 4,913 posts

Posted 06 March 2012 - 07:01 PM

They're following orders to keep their jobs. But I digress.

This is basically the result of months of OWS conversations. A devolve into cops vs. protesters. the conversation has long since been over on the reason and replaced with sympotms of the actions.

Good night suite prince. (((OWS)))


like i said many times, they are the front line, and they are the protectors of the elite. in instances like what we have going on now, law enforcement is not concerned with enforcing laws. this is proven when you see the stories of crimes and tragedies that could have been prevented had the police considered them higher priorities than peaceful protests and responded accordingly.

but i digress. the fact that this much manpower is being used against us means we are indeed being taken seriously. they moved the G8 summits to camp david and are passing law after law to try to prevent us from coming out. the elite are taking this very seriously. this has only just begun.

spring is coming.