Milk or Not, That is the Question (A writing from a friend)
#1
Posted 01 March 2009 - 10:01 PM
I'm certainly not going to get out my soapbox here to shout the dangers of dairy. Frankly, I miss cheese. I've been pretty much dairy-free for almost a year now due to an intolerance to the casein protein found in ALL dairy. And cheese's main component that makes it cheesy is casein. One speaker this weekend, Dr. Neal Barnard explained the love affair with cheese comes from a chemical response that occurs when casein is consumed because a portion of casein is actually an opiate. So, it thus makes it so hard to give up an addition with cheese. However, I don't miss milk at all. I've found the substitutes of rice and almond milk to do just fine.
I know it may be shocking to think about cutting the creams and cheeses out, but there's info worth considering. Studies are showing the following information-
1) There is absolutely no correlation between the consumption of dairy and a decrease in osteoporosis. None. Scientists have followed people consuming zero to high amounts of milk daily for years and the rate of osteoporosis is a consistent risk through every level of consumption.
2) The dairy industry is a huge lobby...the government has made deals with restaurants like Wendys and Burger King to push meals with extra cheese. This information is available through the Freedom for Information Act.
3) Men and women who consume milk/dairy daily increase their risk of breast and prostate cancer.
4) Dairy is mucus producing and many people are intolerant to it, but don't know it. Certain populations are more intolerant than others. And yes, you can get enough calcium by consuming other foods high in calcium such as greens and certain whole grains.
5) The hype around drinking Raw Milk is over blown because of the dairy industry which is why it is never widely reported when people get sick and die of regular store-bought milk...which does happen. I have never tried Raw Milk, so let me know your own personal experiences. I'd be interested to hear them.
So, decide for yourself what is right for you, but remember, the things that we believe and the phrases we know (aka. Milk...does a body good) are paid for by a lobby wanting you to buy its product. The dairy industry has a vested interest in our constant consumption of it's product. I know it's easy to just stick with the status quo, but remember, each day, meal by meal, we set ourselves up for failure or success. Is your pleasure of dairy consumption worth more to you than your own continued good health?
This is taken from my Friend, Evolving Well.
http://www.evolvingwell.com/Home.html
#4
Posted 02 March 2009 - 09:49 PM
Now he has an allergy to it.
I was never a fan of milk but always forced to drink it as a kid.
I always just pictured cow piss while drinking milk.
Tell Stephen about the pus that comes out from over-milked cows.
That's enough to deter anyone.
#8
Posted 07 June 2011 - 02:29 PM
#15
Posted 04 September 2011 - 03:41 PM
mmm i love milk. i've never heard "consume dairy, help avoid osteoporosis", i've only heard "consume calcium, help avoid osteoporosis". interesting.
one of the best things you can do for your body to avoid osteoporosis is weight bearing exercise.
I don't know how accurate this is?
http://articles.merc...nes-Weaker.aspx
#16
Posted 04 September 2011 - 08:40 PM
Milk is needed for health and milk is useful for weight gain as well as for weight loss.And milk is one kind of energy provider and we can get vitamin from milk so milk is needed.So each person should drink at least a cup of milk in a day.
needed for health = nonsense.
#17
Posted 12 September 2011 - 10:25 AM
Ya know, I love milk. And I love cheese. And I don't intend on ever giving it up.
I don't eat or drink it every day. Moderation in all things including moderation.
Now, on the topic of milk as nourishment - I am certain you have heard the term "milk and honey" - milk and honey are really the only two substances out there whose only purpose is nourishment. Fruits and vegetables, and all plant-based food for that matter? It's purpose is to propagate itself as a species. Animals? Same thing. Milk and honey? Those are created to nourish the young. That is it's sole purpose. You can certainly argue that it is there to nourish the young and so therefore is not required by adults, you can argue that it is species specific - and you'd be correct. But it still stands that those substances are here to act as food and nothing else. Which is just an interesting fact, or at least I find it to be.
#18
Posted 12 September 2011 - 05:07 PM
and the milk most people are drinking today (homogenized, pasteurized, antibiotic infused..) is not the milk any species was intended to drink.
#19
Posted 12 September 2011 - 05:42 PM
#20
Posted 12 September 2011 - 11:15 PM
But every species seems to do just fine moving on the other forms of nourishment once they are weened from milk.
and the milk most people are drinking today (homogenized, pasteurized, antibiotic infused..) is not the milk any species was intended to drink.
I don't think I disagreed with that in my post, I just think it is interesting that out of everything any living creature eats, there are really only two things that exist purely as nourishment - the rest are other living things that are just trying to succeed as a species.
That always kinda makes me pause - and makes me hungry for milk and honey!
#21
Posted 15 September 2011 - 03:03 PM
#25
Posted 21 November 2011 - 05:16 AM











