Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Farm bill ends subsidies, cuts food stamps (is this good for the farming industry?)


  • Please log in to reply
7 replies to this topic

#1 concert andy

concert andy
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,432 posts
  • LocationPhilly

Posted 28 January 2014 - 03:44 PM

 
A group of bipartisan lawmakers on Monday agreed to a deal on a farm bill that would end direct subsidies to farms in favor of crop insurance.
 
The deal could trim as much as $90 a month from food stamps for 850,000 recipients.
 
The farm bill would last five years and needs to pass both chambers and then be signed by the president.
 
The bill could be passed before the spring planting season. That's significant because farmers need to know early how it might affect prices and what to expect for their corn, wheat or tobacco yields.
 
The bill changes the current agricultural subsidy system. It ends direct payments to farmers for planting crops and replaces it with a revamped, beefed-up crop insurance program.
 
"Today's bipartisan agreement puts us on the verge of enacting a five-year Farm Bill that saves taxpayers billions, eliminates unnecessary subsidies, creates a more effective farm safety-net and helps farmers and businesses create jobs," said Sen. Debbie Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat who chairs the Senate agriculture panel.
 
The changes to food stamps would trim $8 billion from the program over the next 10 years, according to congressional aides. That's less than the $39 billion that Republicans had wanted to cut from the program, but double what Democrats had suggested.
 
Lawmakers say the deal will prevent 17 states from doling out more generous food stamps to people who get federal help to heat or cool their homes, even if the help is as little as $1. They stress the move won't cut families from food stamps, it will just shrink the amount some families get.
 
Advocates for the poor are irate. The newly-proposed reductions come just months after the $11 cut from food stamp checks that went into effect on Nov. 1, when the recession-era boost in funding ended.
 
Since then, food pantries have reported larger crowds, as families exhaust their allotment before the month ends.
 
Currently, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, the official name for food stamps, feeds 47 million people.
 
Meanwhile, the bill ensures that the federal government will avoid re-implementing a 1940s era subsidy program that could have caused the price of milk to double to $7 a gallon from the current national average of $3.50.  To top of page
 
other sources:
 
 


#2 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 28 January 2014 - 04:49 PM

It's good for taxpayers. Is it good for the farming industry? NO, the same as you'll here moaning and crying should they try to take the tax breaks away from big oil. You'll get every CEO and PR rep out in force selling the notion that these breaks/subsidies are absolutely essential to price stability, and a host of other reasons.

 

Once you start these industries out on the teet, it's almost impossibel to get them off without some consequences and of coursem, soem serbiz.org/kangfirm'd crying abo0ut it.



#3 concert andy

concert andy
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,432 posts
  • LocationPhilly

Posted 28 January 2014 - 05:08 PM

It's good for taxpayers. Is it good for the farming industry? NO, the same as you'll here moaning and crying should they try to take the tax breaks away from big oil. You'll get every CEO and PR rep out in force selling the notion that these breaks/subsidies are absolutely essential to price stability, and a host of other reasons.

 

Once you start these industries out on the teet, it's almost impossibel to get them off without some consequences and of coursem, soem serbiz.org/kangfirm'd crying abo0ut it.

 

 

Thanks TASB.

 

 

 

Did congress do something good?  

 

 

Or is this one of those deals where they save the tax payer money, but we lose in the long run?



#4 TakeAStepBack

TakeAStepBack
  • VibeTribe
  • 18,748 posts

Posted 28 January 2014 - 05:21 PM

It will pro9bably lead to price increases knowing how well central planning works. So, we'll likely eat it anyway.



#5 concert andy

concert andy
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,432 posts
  • LocationPhilly

Posted 28 January 2014 - 05:30 PM

It will pro9bably lead to price increases knowing how well central planning works. So, we'll likely eat it anyway.

 

 

Sound about right.  Thanks again.



#6 Julius

Julius
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,365 posts

Posted 28 January 2014 - 05:50 PM

Farm bill = good policy. It's about damn time.

 

Food stamps = don't really see what this has to with farming.



#7 Royal

Royal
  • VibeTribe
  • 11,926 posts

Posted 28 January 2014 - 11:27 PM

snopes?



#8 Tim the Beek

Tim the Beek
  • VibeTribe
  • 16,318 posts

Posted 29 January 2014 - 01:48 PM

I'll be very surprised if this passes.

 

While I like a lot of it philosophically, ending direct payments, which can't help but increase food prices, and cutting "food stamps" at the same time is going to be viewed as punitive to lower income folks.

A lot of corps with a lot of sway have a vested interest in being able to buy corn and soy at less than they cost to produce.