Jump to content



Photo
- - - - -

Eric Holder: Drone Strike To Kill U.S. Citizen On American Soil Legal, Hypothetically


  • Please log in to reply
54 replies to this topic

#51 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,422 posts

Posted 09 March 2013 - 03:30 PM

So, which is it?  Now Holder says the President/Gov't does not have the authority to use drones to kill Americans on US soil.

 

http://politicaltick...ones/?hpt=hp_t3

 

 

After Rand spent 13 hours on the floor fillibusting Brennan's confirmation, Holder came back with that little note stating "no, he does not."

 

As Rand said, it would have been nice for that to accur months ago. So, it seems that the DOJ and WH were forced to say what shoudl have been said in the first place. Of course they are all liars, so what comes out of their mouth is meaningless.

 

 

Yup, kudos to him for doing the right thing but we've seen how dishonest this administration is and there's no reason to trust them now. They're obviously just saying what they feel we want to hear and then they'll continue on doing what they feel like doing.



#52 concert andy

  • VibeTribe
  • 6,684 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:05 PM

Yup, kudos to him for doing the right thing but we've seen how dishonest this administration is and there's no reason to trust them now. They're obviously just saying what they feel we want to hear and then they'll continue on doing what they feel like doing.

 

While I understand why you say this, I feel your opinion is a very cynical point of view.



#53 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,422 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:48 PM

One man's cynical PoV is another man's realistic PoV. It's not like I don't have a reason to be cynical or that I haven't been pointing out the lies and dishonesty coming from this administration for the last 4+ years. 



#54 Joker

  • VibeTribe
  • 10,422 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:54 PM

US Air Force stops reporting data on Afghanistan drone strikes

 

 

With debate intensifying in the United States over the use of drone aircraft, the U.S. military said on Sunday that it had removed data about air strikes carried out by unmanned planes in Afghanistan from its monthly air power summaries.

 

U.S. Central Command, which oversees the Afghanistan war, said in a statement the data had been removed because it was "disproportionately focused" on the use of weapons by the remotely piloted aircraft as it was published only when strikes were carried out - which happened during only 3 percent of sorties. Most missions were for reconnaissance, it said.

 

The debate over the use of drones in Afghanistan and elsewhere was triggered in part by U.S. President Barack Obama's decision to nominate his chief counter-terrorism adviser John Brennan, an architect of the drone campaign, as the new director of the CIA.

 

The Air Force Times said air force chiefs had started posting the drone data last October in an attempt to provide more detail on the use of drones in Afghanistan.

 

The newspaper said the statistics were provided for November through January, but the February summary released on March 7 had a blank spot where the drone data had previously been listed.

 

"A variety of multi-role platforms provide ground commanders in Afghanistan with close air support capabilities, and it was determined that presenting the weapons release data as a whole better reflects the air power provided" in Afghanistan, Central Command said in its statement.

 

"Protecting civilians remains at the very core of AFCENT's (Air Force Central Command's) mission," it said. "The use of all AFCENT aerial weapons are tightly restricted, meticulously planned, carefully supervised and coordinated, and applied by only qualified and authorized personnel."

 

The statement said the decision to stop reporting the drone strikes was taken with the International Security Assistance Force - the NATO-led coalition in Afghanistan.

 

Brennan was sworn into office on Friday following a protracted confirmation battle that saw Senator Rand Paul attempt to block a vote on the nomination with a technical maneuver called a filibuster, in which he tried to prevent a vote by talking continuously.

 

Paul held the Senate floor for more than 12 hours while talking mainly about drones, expressing concern that Obama's administration might use the aircraft to target U.S. citizens in the United States.

 

http://usnews.nbcnew...ne-strikes?lite



#55 concert andy

  • VibeTribe
  • 6,684 posts

Posted 11 March 2013 - 01:56 PM

One man's cynical PoV is another man's realistic PoV. It's not like I don't have a reason to be cynical or that I haven't been pointing out the lies and dishonesty coming from this administration for the last 4+ years. 

 

 

That is why I said I understand why you say this.