An Extremely sensitive debate
Started by
TakeAStepBack
, Dec 27 2012 02:02 PM
80 replies to this topic
#60
Posted 28 December 2012 - 03:17 PM
None of my kids had names either until after they were born. MY second son went 3 days before I finally decided.
Last year Aleks' name was Laura until after I had her.
And as for abortion.....Well, I guess I don't understand this thread at all. What are you looking for? Something Scientific? Or opinions?
Last year Aleks' name was Laura until after I had her.
And as for abortion.....Well, I guess I don't understand this thread at all. What are you looking for? Something Scientific? Or opinions?
#71
Posted 28 December 2012 - 09:08 PM
Then why is there so much controversy surrounding such?
because it is a wedge issue that opportunists can exploit for political advantage.
I'm not sure if you saw my question, but it wasn't rhetorical. Can you write off a baby as a dependent if it was born after the New Year?
#74
Posted 28 December 2012 - 09:11 PM
because it is a wedge issue that opportunists can exploit for political advantage.
I'm not sure if you saw my question, but it wasn't rhetorical. Can you write off a baby as a dependent if it was born after the New Year?
Now you're talking IRS rules which have nothing to do with morality.
#75
Posted 28 December 2012 - 09:15 PM
Now you're talking IRS rules which have nothing to do with morality.
I agree. But, it could be used as a legal precedent as proof that an unborn fetus is not a person.
But my real point in all this is that the 12 week cutoff is a compromise that we came to many years ago, but for some reason it's getting brought back up again.
If the pro-life people want to re-negotiate, then fine... but I think it will cost them tax dollars that they're not willing to part with.











