398 replies to this topic

[JBetty]

[hoagie]

[Depends]

and seriously guys, include PF in your reindeer games. You are all as silly as he is with the dolphins and nonsequiters. Joker deserved that DERP for running in logic circles, as was illusstrated wonderfully by JBetty. Piling on the Peacefrog is lame man...LAME!

ignoring PF is piling on?

[Depends]

Joker deserved JBettys questions and opinions. PF wasn't part of the discussion, and entered the fray to take a jab at Joker. Not once but twice.

Some would call that "piling on"

[hoagie]

Joker deserved JBettys questions and opinions. PF wasn't part of the discussion, and entered the fray to take a jab at Joker. Not once but twice.

Some would call that "piling on"

Bullshit, that wasn't piling on, that was calling joker a moron with a graphic because, well, he was sounding quite DERPish with his avoidance of the issue.

But whatever, stick together.

[Depends]

How is that "stick together"? As you may recall, Joker and I were on different sides of the issue.

Calling Joker a moron, while technically true, does not add to the (up to then) civil discussion. A post came up saying that the thread was going downhill, and used the name calling post as evidence. From that point, PF was defending his name calling post. And everyone else was ignoring him via shenanigans.

[hoagie]

How is that "stick together"? As you may recall, Joker and I were on different sides of the issue.

Calling Joker a moron, while technically true, does not add to the (up to then) civil discussion. A post came up saying that the thread was going downhill, and used the name calling post as evidence. From that point, PF was defending his name calling post. And everyone else was ignoring him via shenanigans.

Double Standard'd.

[Depends]

Double Standard'd.

I don't see it that way. The thread was lauded by the OP as being civil. Calling someone a DERP does not add to that. Ignoring the name caller, IMO is not piling on. But what ever.

[hoagie]

I don't see it that way. The thread was lauded by the OP as being civil. Calling someone a DERP does not add to that. Ignoring the name caller, IMO is not piling on. But what ever.

PF was not the first person in thread to use a graphic OR a phrase to show someone wass not making sense. But, you continue to see whatever you want.

[MeOmYo]

Name calling adds nothing to the subject/conversation. Yet PF does it often. Others do too.

Do we need a law forcing us to include PF from now on?

[JBetty]

loltechnicallytrue

[hoagie]

Joker calling you out...no problem with this huh?

Or TASB's stupid dolphin derailment on page one.

So keep cliquing together guy.

[Depends]

PF was the first person NOT INVOLVED with the conversation to add a graphic or phrase to rub it in someone's face. Someone who PF has had a history of disagreements.


There are roughly 10,000 thread on this board that I have NOT posted in, Am I piling on those too?

[hoagie]

Name calling adds nothing to the subject/conversation. Yet PF does it often. Others do too.

Do we need a law forcing us to include PF from now on?

Do not confuse pointing out someones blatent stupidity with a graphic as the same thing as insultiong the person personally. There is a world of difference, but if you dont care to really see that, I dont know what to tell you.

PF certainly did not insult Joker...he was pointing out the stupidity of JOKER'S ARGUEMENT.

[hoagie]

PF was the first person NOT INVOLVED with the conversation to add a graphic or phrase to rub it in someone's face.

this proves you have a bone to pick with PF, and I rest my case.

[MeOmYo]

Joker calling you out...no problem with this huh?

Or TASB's stupid dolphin derailment on page one.

So keep cliquing together guy.

read the post where the ha-ha graphic was posted.

the dolphin graphic derailed nothing.

PF post as a personal attack, as he does often and to many.

[Depends]

And BTW, Joker was not "calling me out" with the graphic you posted. Read the post in its entirety. I was making fun of myself for being civil. Joker joined into the joke.

http://www.gathering...post__p__401368

So yeah, I have no problem with that.

[hoagie]

Its cool, you take care of your own, and push out the outsider. Whatevs man, all good over here.

[MeOmYo]

now that that's out of the way, let the shenanigans continue

[Depends]

this proves you have a bone to pick with PF, and I rest my case.

No this proves that PF had a bone to pick with Joker, I have no bone with PF. I was ignoring his namecalling (IMO) and was accused of piling on by ignoring.

PF entered the conversation with one intent. That is to call out Joker. He did it twice. The first time no one said anything, it was just left to drop on it's own.

If you see Joker and me as a clique, you must not have followed our politics....

[Joker]

Joker calling you out...no problem with this huh?

Or TASB's stupid dolphin derailment on page one.

So keep cliquing together guy.

Sorry son, that wasn't close to calling anyone out.

But hey, don't let that stop your little trolling schtick

Hell I'm on the executive board of that asshole's club that Depends was getting booted from for being "civil" ::shudder::

We don't like THAT KIND hanging around us

[hoagie]

No this proves that PF had a bone to pick with Joker, I have no bone with PF. I was ignoring his namecalling (IMO) and was accused of piling on by ignoring.

If they have something going on, how is it your place to call out PF? You choose to involve yourself, and defend your buddy....which looks like piling on to me. Joker can take care of himself, and shouldnt need you to call out PF...

but again, carry on with your clique. Its attractive.,

[Depends]

When someone says Joker stinks, I defend him. I say "Like Shit he does."

[Depends]

Go back and show me where I called him out. I IGNORED HIM.

[hoagie]

im sorry, I am now posting dolphins to ignore you

[Joker]

When someone says Joker stinks, I defend him. I say "Like Shit he does."

Thanks, I sleep better at night knowing you have my backside

[hoagie]

[hoagie]

[Depends]

Now that is just silly. Everyone knows cows can't jump that high when swimming.

[JBetty]

Can we all please just get back on the boat with dolphins and shit?

[Depends]

I think you would be hard pressed to find a thread where Joker and I agreed. But I have enough respect for him, or his ability to express his opinions without namecalling.

[Depends]

[TakeAStepBack]

Did Hoag really get butthurt over dolphins and derps?

[hoagie]

kiss my blowhole.

[Depends]

Did Hoag really get butthurt over dolphins and derps?

I guess a bottlenose can be used as a butthurt device.

[hoagie]

Well, I can see my porpoise here is done...

[Depends]

Well, I can see my porpoise here is done...

I was waiting for the first porpoise joke....

I was betting on Jbetty dusting it off...

[JBetty]

I got interrupted by lolworkywork

[Depends]

You can catch up....

Either with a Dolphin joke, or call Joker a moron.

The new/improved Depends went with the dolphin joke.
The old Depends would have made a moron/joker avatar

[hoagie]

Youre named after an adult diaper...

(yes Im named for a sandwish )

[Depends]

You catch on quick.

A hero ain't nothing but a sandwich...

[TakeAStepBack]

Depends.

[Depends]

Wood Eye

[hoagie]

What everybody here seems to be missing is the fact that Joker The Moron has not answered the question at hand due to all the shenanigans.

the dolphins kick in around 2:00

[Tim the Beek]

Can we all please just get back on the boat with dolphins and shit?

We're gonna need a bigger boat.

[JBetty]

Again - What is unclear is you stated that the business owner should be able to run his business as he sees fit.
The owner sees fit to dispense all medications, including BC pills.
The employee refuses to dispense or transfer BC prescriptions and can not be fired under this new law.
The owner is now not allowed to run his business as he sees fit.

So do you want the owners to be allowed to run their businesses as they see fit, or do you want the employee to be able to refuse to perform some job functions on religious grounds and not be fired?

I'd prefer to have the owner run the business as they see fit. But that isn't happening now under current law regardless of this new piece of crap legislationn. So it's kind of a moot argument.

See, now this is a concrete answer. Thank You.
Joker says he wants it both ways, I'm pointing out that his two statements are in direct conflict with each other, and I'm wondering which statement trumps the other.
What say you, Mr. Joker?

What everyone seems to be missing here is the fact that Joker The Moron has not answered the question at hand due to all the shenanigans.

[Joker]

The owner's should be able to run it the way they choose. They should be allowed to hire whoever they choose and they should be allowed to specify to those applying for the job that it's expected that everyone has there scripts filled regardless of the fillers religious stance. However, I'm not sure if it would be possible to legally hire someone with that caveat without seeing how the law is written.

Employees already working there (before the law went into effect) should be allowed to refuse on religious grounds without fear of losing their jobs.

Does that make better sense?

[TakeAStepBack]

Joker did answer. He wants the business to decide and the employee to decide based on religious belief. Dah.

[JBetty]

Where's that bigger boat?

[TakeAStepBack]