And? I thought you were making a serious inquiry. And I stepped in to correct what I saw as a false premise. What's your point, "playa"?
Please quote me in context, and we can continue.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:03 PM
It's not the first time in this thread you've accused me of saying something I didn't.I stand corrected, I went back and read, and I tied the comment of blaming dems and reps for not allowing 3rd party candidates having viable chance of being elected to the outraged not mattering which side it comes from.
But I can not have a civil discussion. When i am wrong I state so, not double down on abuse or being a dick.
But you are the expert on civility.
Oh and I asked you clearly if I was correct, I did not state it as fact.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:09 PM
Yeah, it's one thing being abused for something that's true but it seems folks feel they have to make shit up and twist my words around.Jack, you're an easy target for being abused with false accusations. You can join the club if you like.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:11 PM
It's not the first time in this thread you've accused me of saying something I didn't.
As I've said before I give back what I get from others. When you stop spouting off shit that isn't true and attributing it to me maybe you'll deserve a little respect and civility, until then you'll no longer get either from me.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 08:22 PM
Yeah, it's one thing being abused for something that's true but it seems folks feel they have to make shit up and twist my words around.
I have no problem taking shit for things I do say and it's not like I don't voice enough of my opinions to provide the fodder
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:06 PM
No it's not. You're just making shit up again. Have fun with that. You've clearly shown you either don't want to, or are just incapable of, having an honest discussion.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:11 PM
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:15 PM
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:23 PM
Never said it to seany, he isn't in that category.
Perhaps if you folks that like to accuse me of saying things took the time to check first and quote me rather than just yapping shit without knowing what you're talking about these types of "misunderstandings" wouldn't occur.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:29 PM
if you wear a rubber glove, it feels like someone else is touching you.
either way, it's always Joker and TASB against the world.
and if Jill Stein won, how do you know she would keep her word? Who the hell is she anyway? Where did she come from? What experience does she have? All I know about her is that the only way she can make the news is by getting arrested. You have to do more than get arrested to earn my vote.
I don't think she's qualified. A true statesman wouldn't get arrested 2 weeks before the election, IMHO. There are better ways of garnering attention. (I'm not saying that civil disobedience doesn't have it's place, but in her case she should have avoided it. It was an obvious desperate plea for publicity.)
I don't really think we should elect radicals, either. Incrementalism is a more balanced approach -- and I think most people agree.
Jill Stein is a socialist (if you think Obama is, then there's no doubt about her)
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:34 PM
So I guess when you said this you were just talking out of your ass again.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:47 PM
Lets play "where did Andy take responsibility in this thread for Obama's drone policies" next!
OK. I voted for him and it is all my fault, not the other half of the country who also voted for him but tell me how this ...
would be better if I had voted for Gary Johnson or Rossanne Barr?
I mean I voted for Grampa Al Lewis as governor of NY in 2000. On 9/11, I thought, thank god he did not win.
You keep believing that outrage or pointing out hypocrisies will make any change.
I do not believe in change. It is the same regurgitated BS. I do not believe in any of them. The only thing that matters to me is that every one is treated equally. I want the US to be the place where every one is free, every one is accepted for who they are no matter how crazy or what religion you believe in or who they marry. Since we are no longer the definite military power in the world, or the biggest economy in the world, we should be the place in the world where we lead by example in the way we live and accept every one regardless.
The only way to make sure of this in my opinion is to make sure there is a liberal compassionate judges who will do the right thing morally and legally.
So go on and believe in 3rd parties, or be outraged, or decide to abstain from voting, but I feel your lack of caring for your fellow man and caring more about some future 4, 8, 12 years from now when that party is may be on the ticket. By then I will be a decade older and may not feel the same way then.
But it is somehow in a round about way my fault.
That is why my obnoxious response was saying. Blame me, I voted for this guy. Every president does bad things. Wasn't Clinton president for Black hawk down. Bad things happen in the world. I accept this.
Semantics are lost on you. It is cut and dry. I voted for him so I am fault for supporting his policies.
OK. You win. Does not change my mind about anything, but all Obama voters are jerks for not being upset. We get it.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:50 PM
Nah just a little bitch slap to keep him in line. Kid just can't seem to tell the truth
Posted 27 November 2012 - 10:52 PM
So sarcasm of the highest degree and pot shots at Jack is admission? Alrighty. That's better than nothing.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:02 PM
Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:12 PM
Right in those two posts you quoted you're insinuating I don't care for my fellow man and that I think all Obama voters are jerks for not being upset.
That's the sort of "spouting shit" I was talking about
Jesus man, did you just respond without reading what I said? I never said it was all your fault. In fact, I specifically said it's NOT just you it's everybody that voted for him.
Would what be better if you voted for someone else?
I don't know if anything would be better but you wouldn't bear the responsibility for electing Obama if you had voted for someone other than Obama.
Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:15 PM
Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:20 PM
Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:26 PM
Posted 27 November 2012 - 11:31 PM
Call it semantics or anything else you want. I'll call it what it is, it's untrue bullshitEdited because To clarify my point further, you do care for your fellow man, except your solution for gay marriage is not realistic, but we agree they should have the same rights. Just semantically your way will never happen, and where we differ.
But aren't you saying that most Obama supporters get in line just because he is part of the TEAM? How is that saying most. OK, did I go to far with ALL? prolly, but come one, semantics.
I called them jerks, because if your reasoning was correct they would have to be jerks.
Am I wrong?